I don’t have any ground-breaking thoughts other than to say your commentary on this Part was particularly welcome. This was the most difficult for me to work through so far and I’ll have to read it again.
Yes, this and the previous part are two of the hardest things we’ve read yet. The rest of our readings, after Aristotle, should be comparatively easy.
Reply to “Physics III.5: What are Aristotle's arguments that the infinite cannot be a substance (found at 204a7–33)?”