Brief Notes on the Gospel

Is “believe that Jesus died for your sins” the whole Gospel? What if the Bible says otherwise—and what if we’ve missed the most ancient part?

  1. The Gospel—the good news—was the inauguration of the Kingdom of God, and especially the arrival of the King. Many self-identified Christians will nod sagely at this but not actually understand what it means.
  2. When Mark quoted Jesus as saying, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel” (Mark 1:15), all Jews who heard this knew precisely what was being claimed. By “the kingdom of God” he meant the restored kingdom of Israel. “The time” referred to “the day of the Lord,” when the prophecies about this kingdom and the advent of its king—the Messiah—would come true.
  3. These things are obvious to those who have read the Old Testament all the way through, for good understanding. They become more obvious with repeated readings.
  4. The word “gospel” simply means “good news,” and in that context, it is very obvious indeed that the good news concerns the long-awaited restored kingdom.
  5. Note that, at this point in the story, Jesus had been neither crucified nor resurrected. Yet this is indeed the Gospel of John the Baptist and of Jesus himself; they call it that. We will return to this point.
  6. Question: What would Jews quite naturally be expected to do if a genuine king of the Jews arrived?
    Answer: Declare their allegiance to him, of course.
  7. Question: And what if this king were demonstrated through the most stunning signs and wonders to be the Messiah, ushering in the Messianic Kingdom of such frequent Old Testament prophecy?
    Answer: Then the Jews ought to declare their eternal gratitude, extol the glory of the only true God-King, and pledge their allegiance in the most earnest terms, even being willing to die for their Sovereign.
  8. Keep these questions and answers in mind as you consider the following familiar words: Jesus often told his disciples, “follow me” (e.g., Mt 4:19). “If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor… and come and follow me.” (Mt 19:21) “And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?” (Luke 6:46) “If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother [value them below Jesus]… yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.” (Lk 14:26)
  9. Jesus said all of these things after (and in the context of) the announcement of the Kingdom of God, and before his crucifixion.
  10. Hence, the faith that Jesus, as King, demands from us, as subjects, is personal loyalty to and love of the Sovereign of the Kingdom of God.
  11. But to understand what loyalty to this Sovereign entails, we must consider what his will is, and what he values most, which he sums up in his two great commandments: love God, and love your fellow man.
  12. Thus, first, we consider: Jesus is God in the flesh. After all, “I and my Father are one.” Thus, to love him in all loyalty is no different than to “love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength.” (Mk 12:30)
  13. Second, as to our fellow man, as Jesus loves us, he demands that we love each other. “This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you” (Jn 15:12). And to do this is to practice our genuine and vital love of God and his Son. (Jn 10:30) “He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me” (John 14:21).
  14. This is the core of the Gospel that Jesus preached. This Gospel never changed. We must never forget it. We must teach it more. It was made fuller, and its consequences were explored—but this is the core.
  15. The essential act of saving faith always was to embrace the King as Lord and Sovereign. But, also early on, Jesus added more: while those hostile to him would be burned up as so much chaff, those loyal to him would have eternal life: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” (Jn 3:16) “Whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die.” (Jn 11:26)
  16. In declaring their allegiance as well, even Gentiles could be added to the Kingdom, yes, this very same Kingdom: “Many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven.” (Mt 8:11)
  17. Note that, so far, we have “shared the Gospel” in a robust, deeply biblical way. Yet we have said nothing whatsoever about the cross, atonement, or beliefs about these—as deeply important as those are. Which raises the question: What do those things have to do with salvation and with “the Gospel”?
  18. Paul used the word “gospel” to refer to something in addition to the advent of the Kingdom: “Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you … that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures…” (1 Cor 1-4). This, too, was the greatest news. The story became fuller still.
  19. The Gospel that Paul meant was not in conflict with the Gospel of the advent of the Kingdom and the reign on earth of its King. For this extended the most profound news of that same King. Namely, the Messiah was—as prophesied—”despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows” who was “wounded for our transgressions” (Isa 53:3, 5). Yet he rose again, resurrected as he said we would be as well.
  20. But have we changed the subject now? How is this business of the suffering servant and of the resurrection connected to the loyalty we owe him? Jesus shows the connection, again before the resurrection: “He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me… and he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.” (Mt 10:37-38) As he would demonstrate, we should be willing to die on a cross for the kingdom of God, if need be: “Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it…” (Mk 8:34-35).
  21. Such willing self-sacrifice shows where our true loyalties lie. Dying a humiliating death on a cross proves something: “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” (Jn 15:13) It proves our love of God and loyalty to the King.
  22. He did the most spectacular signs and wonders of the Bible; then he suffered such a death as a result of his claim to be the Messiah and the very son of God; and then he rose again, as he had prophesied of himself. By doing all this, he demonstrated to the world that he was who he said he was. By enduring this humiliating death, he died for us, so that we would be inspired—by his own Spirit—to follow him more meaningfully.
  23. His Apostles followed him more meaningfully indeed, and the martyrs after them. All died for our sake even as Jesus did, showing by their stunning self-sacrifice just how strongly they did believe in him and were unwilling to deny him.
  24. This whole story, not any one part of it, is good news indeed.
  25. Yet if we focus, when we “share the Gospel,” only on the blood and the cross of Christ, without explaining the background, they can seem like positively repellent totems to unbelievers that we would like to inspire. (That is how they struck me for many years.)
  26. Though true, it can still be profoundly misleading to say that we are saved by believing that Jesus died for our sins, especially when this is said to those unprepared for the message. For example, some children can hear that in church and think, “Well, I guess that means the Old Testament prophets were not saved.” Skeptical adults not infrequently opine that this is just holy nonsense. (These are both mistakes I made at different times in my life.) Even for those who do understand more, to repeat the familiar formula constantly without dwelling on the essential love and loyalty we owe the very Sovereign of our lives is to preach a sadly weakened Gospel.
  27. And, children, of course: The Old Testament prophets were saved. They were saved in precisely the same way we are, namely, loyalty to the King, who is God himself. He “shall reign for ever and ever.” (Ex 15:18) We may also say, with the psalmist, “God is my King of old, working salvation in the midst of the earth” (Ps 74:12), and with Isaiah, “the Lord is our judge, the Lord is our lawgiver, the Lord is our king; he will save us.” (Isa 33:22) Zephaniah is looking to the Messianic age when he prophesies, “The Lord hath taken away thy judgments, he hath cast out thine enemy: the king of Israel, even the Lord, is in the midst of thee: thou shalt not see evil any more.” (Zep 3:15)
  28. The beginning and end of the Gospel should always be the love of and loyalty to Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. We are saved by keeping the greatest commandment—which is the commandment to true faith. By loving him more deeply than our own lives, we practice our loyalty toward the King, we keep the faith to our Lord, and we are inspired to obey our Master.
  29. If the Gospel is the good news of the Kingdom of God, if we are joined to this same Kingdom, then in the end we will reign with him. This is said in the Old Testament, by Daniel: “But the saints of the most High shall take the kingdom, and possess the kingdom for ever, even for ever and ever.” (Dan 7:18) But it is also in many places in the New Testament, as when Paul says: “Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? … Know ye not that we shall judge angels?” (1 Cor 6:2-3)
  30. But if we are to have such responsible positions in service to the King, we in our lives must demonstrate our loyalty to him. Again: “If ye love me, keep my commandments.” (Jn 14:15) This is not a side-issue. Our trusting loyalty to our King requires that we do his will. If we lose sight of this, if we find it easy to sin carelessly and without repentance, is he really our Sovereign? Do we really believe in him? If he is our King and indeed Lord of the universe, is it not right to fear him? Jesus thought so: “And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” (Mt 10:28) So, as Paul said, “work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.” (Php 2:12)

by

Posted

in

Comments

Please do dive in (politely). I want your reactions!

6 responses to “Brief Notes on the Gospel”

  1. Matthew Bates

    Thanks, Larry, for bearing witness to the good news about Jesus the King–yes!–and for showing how and why loyalty is part of the essential framework. May we joyfully celebrate these truths this Easter–and because of his resurrection power–into the age to come. Let’s keep serving together. ~Matthew Bates

    1. Thanks Matthew!

      Folks, Dr. Matthew Bates’ book, Salvation by Allegiance Alone, is on my reading list. ChatGPT told me to read it for more background on the ideas in the above post (which I thought were rather obvious to find in the Gospels).

  2. Dear Larry,

    I am filled with gratitude to our God to learn of your faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. I just read your latest piece and can understand your trying to piece together this great big theme of the Bible, namely, the Kingdom of God and also your attempt to relate it to the Gospel which was preached by the Apostles of Christ after His death and resurrection and ascension. Kindly allow me to suggest to you, a brother in Christ, that you give the following books a serious read, for it would greatly enhance your understanding of the complex and important topic of the Kingdom of God in the Bible. The fundamental issue is hermeneutics. Do we take the words of the Old Testament prophets in a normal, literal sense or not (with due consideration of the use of figures of speech as such)? If the covenants God made with Israel are to be taken at their normal face value, then it will be clear to any reader of the Bible that the final Kingdom promised to Israel has never been established on earth and that the church cannot be the fulfillment of those covenants which were made exclusively with Israel. And therefore, the covenants demand that the Kingdom of God on this earth is as yet future and that the Church is not the kingdom but a “mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God” (Ephesians 3:9). The conclusions have huge implications as to the believer’s present walk and service.

    As you are a public figure, everything you write can have a significant impact on your readership, whether good or bad. I am certain you are sincere and want to do good. Here are the three books I would suggest you to study carefully. Well, at least one of them, if not all, considering that the third title comes in 3 volumes, a total of more than 2000 pages, small print.

    The Greatness of the Kingdom by Alva J. McClain (1959)
    The Coming Kingdom by Andrew M. Woods (2016)
    The Theocratic Kingdom of our Lord Jesus, the Christ by George N. H. Peters (1884)

    1. Gregg Powell

      Hello Pradesh.
      When you say “Kingdom of God on this earth is as yet future and that the Church is not the kingdom but a “mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God” “- Are you implying the Kingdom of God on this earth will eventually be establish through man’s own effort—an idea often common among Postmillennialism, or sometimes referred to as Dominion Theology or Kingdom Now Theology? I am trying to understand what you are implying about “Kingdom of God on this earth is as yet future” and who will establish it. I perhaps missed something in your response to Larry.

    2. Thanks, Pradesh. I appreciate the recommendations. I agree the question of the Kingdom is central, and our view of it affects everything from hermeneutics to ecclesiology. But here’s the core of my position: the Kingdom prophesied in the Old Testament is indeed literal, but it includes faithful Gentiles as full and equal participants—not as an secondary afterthought, but as the fulfillment of the very promises made to Israel.

      Indeed I have much to read about all areas of theology, although (see here) I have read some. GPT told me last night about the resemblance of my views to those of Wright, McKnight, Gorman, Willard, and Bates, and of the fact that they are in rather stark opposition to dispensationalism. I was aware of the latter, and much of my theological reading has been Calvinist and dispensational, whether I like it or not, since so much evangelical scholarship is indeed Calvinist and/or dispensational. For example, the chapter on Revelation in the DTS-edited Bible Knowledge Commentary is by Walvoord, an arch-dispensationalist, and I found myself partly agreeing (yes, it’s a real kingdom, yes, there is a new creation) and partly disagreeing (the notion that there are groups of people separated due to their ethnicity is flatly contradicted in many places by scripture itself). Anyway, eventually I will indeed read such books as those you list. But I will also at least one of Wright’s books (Simply Good News, How God Became King, and The Day the Revolution Began) and those like these:

      The King Jesus Gospel by Scot McKnight (2011)
      Inhabiting the Cruciform God by Michael J. Gorman (2009)
      The Divine Conspiracy by Dallas Willard (1998)
      Salvation by Allegiance Alone by Matthew W. Bates (2017)

      Most of all, I’ll continue to read the Bible—just started my sixth reading, having done five readings in five years. It is primarily the Bible reading that led me to the position expressed above.

      On the question whether the OT prophecies are meant “literally,” it depends on the prophecy, of course. Some are, some ain’t. Is a literal kingdom prophesied? For sure. Are the faithful children of Israel going to be part of it, according to the same prophecies? Of course. Will they be exclusively Jewish? No. “I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth.” (Isa 49:6) “Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the Lord… even them will I bring to my holy mountain… for mine house shall be called an house of prayer for all people.” (Isa 56:6-7) “And the Gentiles shall come to thy light, and kings to the brightness of thy rising.” (Isa 60:3) The latter is associated with the imagery of Christ as the “bright and morning star.” (Rev 22:16)

      Jesus and the Apostles make it perfectly clear that the Gentiles will be part of this literal “kingdom come.” “And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring… and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.” (Jn 10:16) John the Baptist threw the ethnic pretentions of the Pharisees in their face: “And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.” (Mt 3:9) Paul is especially clear: “Thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree.” (Rom 11:17-18) “There is neither Jew nor Greek… for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.” (Gal 3:28-29) “Ye were… aliens from the commonwealth of Israel… but now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh… Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God.” (Eph 2:12-14, 19) Peter is also clear: “Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
      But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.” (Acts 10:34-35) “But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people;
      that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light: Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.” (1 Peter 2:9-10) So Peter himself asserts that the very verbiage that applied to the Israelites per se, “chosen,” “priesthood,” “people of God,” are now applied to all.

      I’m not saying that these verses settle the matter; of course they don’t. I know dispensationalists interpret these differently by saying, “But that doesn’t mean he didn’t make specific and literal promises to the Israelites!” To which I respond, “True, but that did not prevent the Lord from raising the rest of us up as children of Abraham—John’s “stones”—to become of the very same kingdom. We are indeed, as Peter said, “lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.” (1 Pet 2:4) One house, one “holy priesthood”!

      There are not two Kingdoms. The Scriptures never speak of two Kingdoms. When John and Jesus heralded the one Kingdom, it was the same as that prophesied in the OT.

      I’d be curious how someone steeped in the dispensational texts you list would respond to this. How do you reconcile the notion of a singular prophesied Kingdom with the many declarations of Gentile inclusion, not as guests or as part of a secondary Kingdom, but as “fellow heirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel” (Eph 3:6)?

  3. Adam Martin

    Very well said,
    Your last point – yes indeed fear and trembling. Fear and trust going hand-in-hand. To fully trust outside of oneself is the most fearful most vulnerable thing any creature can do, and thus Jesus says he will give us his Spirit (a helper, an advocate) to dwell within us, to help our ‘unbelief’ (Mark 9:24). Additionally – one of my favorite verses on the ‘backwards’ radicalized love of God is Romans 5:8, “But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.” While we were natural enemies of God, he died for us. Good news indeed! A blessed Lent to you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *