The questions that distinguish the denominations

I want to ask my generous and well-informed Christian readership here for their feedback on a list of questions.

The task is fairly straightforward to state, not maybe not easy to execute: Formulate a list of questions that is minimally sufficient to investigate where one “fits” within the broad denominational landscape. There are other differences, but they are more minor and they are “redundant” in that where some distinctives apply, others will as well (e.g., if Mary is mediatrix, then Purgatory). The hypothesis is that if one had (as unlikely as this might be) completely satisfactory answers to all the questions, then one would know just where one fit in, denominationally.

Broadest distinctives: Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant

These distinguish between Catholics and Orthodox, and between those two and Protestants. Some of these also distinguish between categories of Protestant denominations.

  • What is the rule of faith: sola scriptura, the Church, or something else?
  • Should we affirm sola fide, i.e., that we are saved by faith alone, or do our meritorious works also contribute to our salvation?
  • Can and should we pray to the saints?
  • Is it acceptable to reverence (e.g., kiss, pray before) icons?
  • Is Mary to be accorded special honor above other saints, is she a special intercessor, is she “mother of God,” etc.?
  • Do Communion and Baptism (and others, if considered sacraments) contribute to our salvation?

“High church” and “low church” distinctives

Basically, some churches continue the “high church” traditions found in Catholicism and Orthodoxy. These distinguish, for example, Lutheranism and Anglicanism, and in some cases Presbyterianism, from “less formal” churches.

  • Is the Lord’s Supper symbolically/memorially or really the body and blood of Christ?
  • Is pedobaptism sufficient, or must one be a believer to be properly baptized into the Church?
  • Should church governance be episcopal (bishops), presbyterian (elders), or congregational (local autonomy)?
  • Should worship be liturgical and structured or informal and spontaneous?

Particularly Protestant distinctives

These distinguish between broad branches of, especially, low-church Protestantism, but even these can distinguish, e.g., Orthodoxy (in the case of sanctification and charismata).

  • Does God reprobate the damned from eternity, so that there is nothing they can do to be saved? Did Jesus die for all of mankind or only the elect?
  • Is the Christian life primarily about being declared righteous before God (justification), or about being made righteous (sanctification)?
  • Is the miraculous gifting of the Holy Spirit (e.g., tongues, prophecy, healing) common and expected to be found in the church today, or did it mostly (or entirely) cease after the apostolic age?

Other distinctives

These questions regard innovations unique to the last 150 or 200 years or so of church history.

  • Should explicit creeds be adopted, to distinguish a denomination from others?
  • Can Scripture be mistaken or is it “inerrant in the original autographs”?
  • Is it acceptable to have extremely large churches, with “performances” for “audiences”?
  • Should the Church actively engage in socio-political issues, or is its primary role spiritual?

Caveats: I know there are other questions (many other questions; see the excellent Ready to Harvest YouTube channel) on which denominations differ. There is overlap. Again, a person who answers a certain way about Mary and praying to saints will also answer a predictable way about the Apocrypha and Purgatory. I also ask no questions about pre-, a-, and post-millennialism, not because they are unimportant, but because they are not regarded as primary distinctives (even if they are distinctives in some cases). I also know there are many “What denomination am I?” polls. Most of them aren’t very thoughtfully constructed, it seems to me, so they won’t help. I have taken many such polls, for whatever they’re worth.

If you want to help, here are my questions for you:

1. Bearing the above caveats in mind, would you add any questions to the list, either on grounds of the importance or because they draw important denominational (or congregational) distinctions?

2. Would you revise how I formulate a question (or more than one) in some enlightening way?

3. Do you know of any books that systematically treat of these questions, or a similar list of questions, in a reasonably rigorous way? I do not mean just any old theological text, which do treat of these questions, but they are not focused on them in particular, nor are they designed to help the reader decide between positions on them. I also do not mean books for total beginners. I mean serious books for people who actually read theology.

The task is to make a fairly minimal list of the most fundamental questions and those that mark the differences between the major denominations.


by

Posted

in

Comments

Please do dive in (politely). I want your reactions!

55 responses to “The questions that distinguish the denominations”

  1. frances young a well known patristics scholar recently did a two volume work and she covers the rule of faith and the development of canon as a kind of feedback loop.. worth the effort if a bit dry

  2. DANIEL william DOWDELL

    Good Today ! __ ” Jesus the Christ of GOD ” , a simple trueth easily found in the early Writtings of the Jewish{ Hebrew } and Gentile Be-Livers of the ” Way, Trueth, Life “. __ humbly, neighbour daniel __ thanks for increasing knowledge in this our troubled time .

  3. Kurt Haldeman

    I think you have here a fairly good set of questions to be answered – I agree with the additions of the filioque and the Pope WRT church governance. The text to read from the Lutheran perspective is the book of Concord, which deals with all the questions in question 🙂 above.

  4. Taylor

    There are many other questions you could add, but regarding credobaptism versus pedobaptism, an equally important question to whether one must be baptized as a believer is whether one must baptize one’s children. Both positions agree that believers must be baptized. All Baptists believe that infants should not be baptized, but not all insist on rebaptizing believers who were baptized as infants.

    This also goes to what baptism means and what if anything is the covenant relationship of children is in the church. Most denominations that baptize babies consider them covenant Christian members of the church. Baptists may “dedicate” their babies but they are not considered members of the church.

    As for communion, in your discussions of real presence you seem to have skipped over the Reformed views of the Lord’s Supper regarding real spiritual presence when the elements are set apart, which is a middle view between the purely symbolic and memorial view which denies any special presence and the holy mystery transubstantiation or sacramental union views.

    Also absent are important questions of church polity, over which wars have been fought. Some of these include: do congregations have the right to choose their own ministers? Who leads the church? Are congregations independent, associated, or do they answer to higher church courts? If so, how are those church courts constituted? Is church property ultimately owned and controlled by the local church or held in trust by a higher church organ? Does civil government have a role in the administration of the church?

    The role of women can also divide denominations, even among those agreeing that women cannot be preaching/teaching ministers, what is their role and what if any church offices may they occupy?

  5. Rhonda

    A great YouTube channel that very concisely explains each denominations beliefs is called Ready to Harvest. Thank you for sharing your testimony!

  6. Kirstan Jennings

    P.S.
    Also, to one of your questions above, I would say that no, politics should not mix with church affairs.
    Jesus said, “render unto Ceasar what Caesars’ and unto God what is God’s”

    Also look at the decalogue (the tablets with the moral commandments) there are 2.
    One side 1-4 consisting of our lateral relationship and duties to God and the second tablet, 6-10 out civil duties to mankind. They are separate.
    Look at the way that God set up the civil laws and the spiritual laws in the bible everything had order and politics did not mix. The dark ages show us what happens when the “Church” has state/civil and religious control.
    I might as well go into this while I am on the topic….
    The only ruling power in our world that has church and states rule is The Vatican, the little horn (Daniel 7) power. The lamb-like beast with 2 horns represents America, we were built on Christ(lamb)-like (Christian)beliefs yet have a separation of church and state power yet speaks as a dragon(deceitful)- the papacy has one horn (horn in prophecy reps a ruler/kingdom/king or power) and the one horn is a combination.
    Another thing, the littler horn thought to change “times and laws, they admit it: ” It is well to remind the Presbyterians, Baptists, Methodists, and all other Christians, that the Bible does not support them anywhere in their observance of Sunday. Sunday is an institution of the Roman Catholic Church, and those who observe the day observe a commandment of the Catholic Church.”
    —Priest Brady, in an address, reported in the Elizabeth, NJ ‘News’ on March 18, 1903.
    “Of course these two old quotations are exactly correct. The Catholic Church designated Sunday as the day for corporate worship and gets full credit – or blame – for the change.”
    —This Rock, The Magazine of Catholic Apologetics and Evangelization, p.8, June 1997

    “The Church, on the other hand, after changing the day of rest from the Jewish Sabbath, or seventh day of the week, to the first, made the Third Commandment refer to Sunday as the day to be kept holy as the Lord’s Day. The Council of Trent (Sess. VI, can. xix) condemns those who deny that the Ten Commandments are binding on Christians.”
    —The Catholic Encyclopedia, Commandments of God, Volume IV, © 1908 by Robert Appleton Company, Online Edition © 1999 by Kevin Knight, Nihil Obstat – Remy Lafort, Censor Imprimatur – +John M. Farley, Archbishop of New York, page 153

    They took the 10th commandment and cut it in half, just look at their catechism. Its in there. That is a fulfillment of Prophecy.

    https://www.sabbathtruth.com/sabbath-history/denominational-statements-on-the-sabbath/id/catholic

  7. Kirstan Jennings

    If what they believe lines up entirely with scripture, the truth will be in them. Any church that defies any of the moral commandments, even the 4th commandment – (which 3/4 of the world’s Christians break) willingly may not be on the right path. Sadly, many do because they think they are honoring the Lord’s resurrection day. While that may be a beautiful thought or reason, it was never commanded nor taught. Even Jesus said, “if you love me, keep my commandments”. In Revelation, talking about the people that are saved it says Rev 14:12 “Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.”
    James 2:10,11
    “For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in ONE point, he is guilty of ALL.
    For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law.”
    I mean the list can go on, but I digress.
    A deep overview on this topic is here: https://www.sabbathtruth.com/

    I believe that many if not every denomination has a heart for the Lord and try, with what light they’ve been given, do what they feel is right, but when we have scripture that says:
    “Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ “And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’ Mat 7:22,23
    …then this should tell you something, it means that there are indeed denominations doing great wonders for the Lord but do not embrace truth down to the core and live it.
    We can be in church but not in Christ – or He in us. “…having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away!” 2Ti 3:5
    If you go to a pastor and he/she says, ‘yea do this do that – don’t kill, don’t lie, obey your parents, love God but don’t keep His Holy day of rest, that one we don’t do it when you want to,’ , it should raise an alarm.

    Consider this.
    There were 2 main things INSTITUTED at creation’s completion: the Sabbath and marriage. The sabbath points to ultimate rest in Him, marriage points to the “Marriage supper of the Lamb aka The Church(bride of Christ) joining to Him forever.

    Another amazing thought.
    How do we know when its been a year, the earth going around the sun once. How do you know its been a month, the new moon cycle.
    How do you know its been one week, the Sabbath!
    God knew what He was doing He is a God of Order and Love.

    Any ways this is my loving response to your topic- may sound like I am attacking I guess but I am not I am being honest.
    I am a member of the Seventh day Adventist church and have been for 4 years, I have a rocky past, but God led me here – couldn’t be happier. I am very ‘solo scriptura’ and go by the bible alone (I am not a follower of Ellen White, though much of her writings are very insightful and definitely inspired; I say this bc the internet has much misleading things to say about our denomination i see that as even more of a sign it is the right way bc why else would it be so attacked, think about that)
    any ways I typed this in a hurry so forgive my grammar and unprofessionalism.

    For more on what we believe see our 28 fundamental beleifs pdf: https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=c6d41184d6ee8f83bc7c9439ee56f2c136bed3b60bcc6897cde026d724b41b9fJmltdHM9MTc0MDYxNDQwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=3abdbf37-bb2d-68a2-1ec9-aa63ba4169ec&psq=28+fundamentals+of+seventh+day+adventist+PDF&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYWR2ZW50aXN0Lm9yZy93cC1jb250ZW50L3VwbG9hZHMvMjAyMC8wNi9BRFYtMjhCZWxpZWZzMjAyMC5wZGY&ntb=1

    By the way I love your testimony. Praise God.

    1. Kirstan Jennings

      Additionally,

      The view on prophecy should be added to your list of questions.
      Most denominations roll with one that doesn’t “scare” them – or call them to repentance/holiness/stir them, I should say. The one that does not make them uncomfortable.

      Do a study on the 3 main views.

      In brief:

      Futurism claims that most of the prophecies of the Apocalypse were fulfilled to ancient Rome, and the rest is restricted to a literal Antichrist who will reign for 3½ literal years. Futurism further claims that the Antichrist will be an individual and not a system.

      The issues of futurist view of prophecy include:
      -Violation of consistent prophetic symbolism.
      -Making prophetic time meaningless.
      -Removing application from historical verification.
      -Creating an arbitrary gap.
      -Ignoring the view of the early church.

      Preterism is a Christian eschatological view that interprets biblical prophecies as events that have already been fulfilled in history.
      There are two main types of preterism: full preterism, which holds that all prophecies were fulfilled in the first century, and partial preterism, which maintains that most prophecies concerning Jerusalem’s destruction have been fulfilled.

      The issues of preterist view of prophecy include:
      -Preterism is an expedient designed to shield Rome.
      -Preterism violates the principle of consistent symbolism.
      -Preterism glorifies the Papacy by ignoring the actualities.
      -Preterism denies the elemental principle of Bible prophecy.
      -Preterism offers no adequate fulfillments.
      -Preterism looks at prophecy in a linear Greco-Roman perspective.
      -Preterism has a skewed view of biblical prophecy.
      -Full preterism teaches that all biblical prophecy has been fulfilled.

      Historicists believe that prophetic interpretation reveals the entire course of history of the church from the writing of the Book of Daniel, some centuries before the close of the 1st century, to the end of time. Historicism is a method of interpretation in Christian eschatology which associates biblical prophecies with actual historical events and identifies symbolic beings with historical persons or societies. (I searched Bing like the others for “issues with the historicist view” and AI did not generate an immediate list like the others, so I didn’t put one).

      Logically speaking, the historical one holds the most water, but that’s my opinion.
      Here is prolific scholar on the topics, he goes into a deep 12-part study. (Note: he doesn’t go into much detail about the preterist view because of how contradictive of scripture that it is so he reviews it briefly but mainly covers Futurism and Historicism.)
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWusjWNy6mI&list=PLgl7ryoHpladG87ijKB83x1Pm_i35F5pY

      Also, I want to rebuttal on my first comment, towards the bottom about my church. I don’t think “MY” denomination is “right” as in the only right one – but rather the teachings and observances and respects we hold towards the Lord and His Word and His laws (which reflect His character) are indeed right. I wanted to clarify that I feel that no matter the denomination you sit with each week, if you personally have a strong relationship/walk with Him and love others AND follow “thus saith the Lord” to a T, you are on the right path. The law is fulfilled in love – as in we wouldn’t want to break His laws if we love our neighbors and love Him with all our hearts. Amen?!

  8. Jonathan Barker

    Why does everything have to turn out to be Christian when two thirds of the world’s human population are not questions.
    Remember too that world wide there are now well over 30,000 Christian denominations, sects and sub-sects all competing for a share of the market place of the whats-in-it-for-me consumerist religiosity.
    Remember too that the wages and the business of sinners is death and collectively sinners inevitably create hell on earth especially as there are now 8 billion of us and we now have the very powerful technology so to do.

  9. Brian

    I consider myself an infant in regards to any, and all, philosophical ideas, expressions, and explanations. For honesty of who is speaking, I am 48. I choose non-denominational church allegiance, without any negative views on any denomination, except those that deny Christ as God. I will not answer any of your questions (as I see you have a new journey ahead of you), but I offer my experience with what your questions clearly imply.

    Like you, I was raised in a Protestant family. My brother and sister took your early views and walked away from the faith (later returning, God be praised). I dug deeper into the Bible, making every decision based on clear scripture and not my opinion, or my own interpretation of scripture. In 2000, I tasted of the reality of Denominationalism, and it broke me.

    I learned years later that the cause of Denominations is a hard heart (Matt. 19:8). Believers in Christ and non-believers have the same main fault; we justify our decisions, mistakes, and sins, and argue with God about true righteousness.

    I Corinth 13:9-13 speaks of how little we know about truth- “…for we know in part…”. Reading your questions, I found myself in you. The answers I found were in the Bible, word for word, clearly spelled out. My own bias for Unity in the Church of Christ, made it difficult for me to find those answers. But they are in there.

    There is a revival in the world. One that I never thought I would live to see. CBN has posted so many nations coming to Christ. It greatly encourages me, that you are one of them. Brother, I long to talk with you in heaven, as I do to talk with Abraham, Joseph, and Job. Grace, Mercy, and Peace be multiplied to you.

  10. Keefe Drayton

    I watched you on Allie Beth Stuckey and found your testimony very encouraging.
    There is much to say but first take a look at the following link. https://www.great-controversy.org/Whole-GCspdf/GC84-all.pdf

    1. Kirstan Jennings

      Amen. Its was inspiring. Great book you are sharing, much truth to be found in that one!!

Leave a Reply to Kurt Haldeman Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *