The questions that distinguish the denominations

I want to ask my generous and well-informed Christian readership here for their feedback on a list of questions.

The task is fairly straightforward to state, not maybe not easy to execute: Formulate a list of questions that is minimally sufficient to investigate where one “fits” within the broad denominational landscape. There are other differences, but they are more minor and they are “redundant” in that where some distinctives apply, others will as well (e.g., if Mary is mediatrix, then Purgatory). The hypothesis is that if one had (as unlikely as this might be) completely satisfactory answers to all the questions, then one would know just where one fit in, denominationally.

Broadest distinctives: Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant

These distinguish between Catholics and Orthodox, and between those two and Protestants. Some of these also distinguish between categories of Protestant denominations.

  • What is the rule of faith: sola scriptura, the Church, or something else?
  • Should we affirm sola fide, i.e., that we are saved by faith alone, or do our meritorious works also contribute to our salvation?
  • Can and should we pray to the saints?
  • Is it acceptable to reverence (e.g., kiss, pray before) icons?
  • Is Mary to be accorded special honor above other saints, is she a special intercessor, is she “mother of God,” etc.?
  • Do Communion and Baptism (and others, if considered sacraments) contribute to our salvation?

“High church” and “low church” distinctives

Basically, some churches continue the “high church” traditions found in Catholicism and Orthodoxy. These distinguish, for example, Lutheranism and Anglicanism, and in some cases Presbyterianism, from “less formal” churches.

  • Is the Lord’s Supper symbolically/memorially or really the body and blood of Christ?
  • Is pedobaptism sufficient, or must one be a believer to be properly baptized into the Church?
  • Should church governance be episcopal (bishops), presbyterian (elders), or congregational (local autonomy)?
  • Should worship be liturgical and structured or informal and spontaneous?

Particularly Protestant distinctives

These distinguish between broad branches of, especially, low-church Protestantism, but even these can distinguish, e.g., Orthodoxy (in the case of sanctification and charismata).

  • Does God reprobate the damned from eternity, so that there is nothing they can do to be saved? Did Jesus die for all of mankind or only the elect?
  • Is the Christian life primarily about being declared righteous before God (justification), or about being made righteous (sanctification)?
  • Is the miraculous gifting of the Holy Spirit (e.g., tongues, prophecy, healing) common and expected to be found in the church today, or did it mostly (or entirely) cease after the apostolic age?

Other distinctives

These questions regard innovations unique to the last 150 or 200 years or so of church history.

  • Should explicit creeds be adopted, to distinguish a denomination from others?
  • Can Scripture be mistaken or is it “inerrant in the original autographs”?
  • Is it acceptable to have extremely large churches, with “performances” for “audiences”?
  • Should the Church actively engage in socio-political issues, or is its primary role spiritual?

Caveats: I know there are other questions (many other questions; see the excellent Ready to Harvest YouTube channel) on which denominations differ. There is overlap. Again, a person who answers a certain way about Mary and praying to saints will also answer a predictable way about the Apocrypha and Purgatory. I also ask no questions about pre-, a-, and post-millennialism, not because they are unimportant, but because they are not regarded as primary distinctives (even if they are distinctives in some cases). I also know there are many “What denomination am I?” polls. Most of them aren’t very thoughtfully constructed, it seems to me, so they won’t help. I have taken many such polls, for whatever they’re worth.

If you want to help, here are my questions for you:

1. Bearing the above caveats in mind, would you add any questions to the list, either on grounds of the importance or because they draw important denominational (or congregational) distinctions?

2. Would you revise how I formulate a question (or more than one) in some enlightening way?

3. Do you know of any books that systematically treat of these questions, or a similar list of questions, in a reasonably rigorous way? I do not mean just any old theological text, which do treat of these questions, but they are not focused on them in particular, nor are they designed to help the reader decide between positions on them. I also do not mean books for total beginners. I mean serious books for people who actually read theology.

The task is to make a fairly minimal list of the most fundamental questions and those that mark the differences between the major denominations.


by

Posted

in

Comments

Please do dive in (politely). I want your reactions!

55 responses to “The questions that distinguish the denominations”

  1. Luiz Phelippe Fernandes.

    Dear brother, for Catholic questions I strongly recommend the following authors: Peter Kreeft, Scott Hahn and Dave Armstrong. On Ecclesiology and the relationship of the Church with the contemporary world the writings of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI) and Karol Wojtyla (John Paul II). Peace of Christ.

  2. Diane Sperber

    Sorry but the website address was deleted from my previous comment. I was encouraging you to explore The Banner of Truth website, which is banneroftruth.org.

  3. Diane Sperber

    Larry, I hope to encourage you to consider this website . Their theme text is from Psalm 60:4: You have given a banner to those who fear You, that it may be displayed because of the truth. Their objective is the advancement and dissemination of better knowledge and understanding of the history and doctrines of the true Biblical Christian Faith. They also seek to produce material that in God’s providence may be used as a means to bring people to repentance and faith in Jesus Christ as their Savior and Lord.
    I recently have been reading many of their books by Martyn Lloyd-Jones. I personally would recommend, Great Doctrines of The Bible, three volumes in one. Michael Haykin, a professor of Church History and Biblical Spirituality says that the two-volume biography of Martyn Lloyd- Jones was the most powerful twentieth-century influence on his life.
    At the age of 23 he left a rural background to be the Chief Clinical Assistant to Sir Thomas Horder, the King’s Physician. And then suddenly at 27 he felt called to be a preacher in South Wales. Some regarded his change of career as foolish. But the one thing, Dr Lloyd-Jones was sure was that his settlement amid the industrial depression of South Wales was no sacrifice: ‘I gave up nothing. I received everything. I count it the highest honour God can confer on any man to call to be herald of the gospel’.

  4. Galya

    I think Joshua Charles (https://x.com/JoshuaTCharles) is someone who could be particularly helpful for you in answering question #3 (Do you know of any books that systematically treat of these questions, or a similar list of questions, in a reasonably rigorous way? ): despite the fact that you would currently disagree with his own final choice, he should be a great resource as far as serious books on the subject are concerned, having himself worked through a rather impressive number of them, both from the various Protestant and Catholic perspectives (and starting from the earliest Fathers).

  5. Dr. Nobbo

    Dear Larry, Dr. Gavin Ortlund has recently released a book titled “Why I am a Protestant”.

    The book has a nice / irenic tone to it, as does his YouTube channel / podcast.

    He has recently entered into dialogues with Catholic and Orthodox leaders.

    Gavin is Reformed FWIW.

    OT perhaps, bit if you want philosophical apologetics materials, I would recommend William Lane Craig’s works. He has debated so many big names over the recent decades. The Intelligent Design Movement (hated as it is by many) is also a wonderful source of cutting edge science (informational science connecting to biology etc.) and I would highly recommend Stephen Meyer’s books. He was on Joe Rogan’s podcast about a year ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *