WikiCritic

Independent reviews of Wikipedia articles

WikiCritic aggregates public reviews, talkback, subject responses, and AI quality assessments of Wikipedia articles—so readers can see what Wikipedia won't tell them about its own coverage.

1,247 articles assessed
8,930 comments aggregated
412 reverted-content reports
63 subject responses
1,104 related online pages

Submit a comment

Publish your review or talkback on your own platform, then submit the URL. Our agent fetches and imports it. You can also submit a related online page—coverage about an article rather than a comment on it.

Start a submission →

PolicyScanner

Check how Wikipedia's own policies and guidelines have been applied to an article—and where they've been bent.

Scan an article →

How WikiCritic works

An aggregator, not a host. Learn how reviews are imported, how AI assessments are generated, and the needs it serves.

Read the concept →
Examples
Three worked examples, each with its dossier, the full AI assessment behind the grades, and the source documents exactly as their authors published them.

Acupuncture

Topic article · 11 comments
DAID+HumanD+Both
Aggregator AI report Sources A comment

Peter Schiff

Biography of a living person · 10 comments
CAIFHuman
Aggregator AI report Sources

Jacob G. Hornberger

No Wikipedia article · 5 comments
NO GRADE — NOTHING TO ASSESS
Aggregator No AI report Sources
Leaderboards
Rankings across all assessed articles. Six boards, each built from a different part of the comment standard rather than one grade sorted six ways. Example data—only Acupuncture, Peter Schiff and Jacob G. Hornberger link to live mockups.

Recently Assessed

Newest per-revision AI assessments
  1. 1Peter Schiff BLPCAIJul 282026
  2. 2AcupunctureDAIJul 282026
  3. 3Jacob G. Hornberger NO ARTICLEJul 262026
  4. 4Robert F. Kennedy Jr. BLPDAIJul 242026
  5. 5IvermectinDAIJul 212026
  6. 6Nikola TeslaAAIJul 192026

Worst, According to AI

Lowest Overall grade from our rubric
  1. 1GamergateFAI5 of 6failing
  2. 2HydroxychloroquineDAI4 of 6failing
  3. 3Robert F. Kennedy Jr. BLPDAI4 of 6failing
  4. 4Falun GongDAI4 of 6failing
  5. 5AcupunctureDAI4 of 6failing
  6. 6IvermectinDAI3 of 6failing

Worst, According to You

Lowest weighted grade from human reviewers
  1. 1Peter Schiff BLPFHuman9reviews
  2. 2GamergateFHuman22reviews
  3. 3Climate change denialD−Human28reviews
  4. 4HydroxychloroquineD−Human25reviews
  5. 5Great Barrington DeclarationDHuman19reviews
  6. 6AcupunctureD+Human11reviews

Where AI and Reviewers Disagree

Largest AI-versus-reader gap
  1. 1IvermectinAI D → readers BDAI2.0grades
  2. 2Nikola TeslaAI A → readers C−AAI2.0grades
  3. 3Peter Schiff BLPAI C → readers FCAI1.7grades
  4. 4Falun GongAI D → readers C+DAI1.6grades
  5. 5AcupunctureAI D → readers D+DAI0.3grades

Recently Received Comments

Newest human comments. Links go to the article, not the comment
  1. 1AcupunctureReview · medical librarianD+Both28 Jul2026
  2. 2Peter Schiff BLPRebuttal · answers a reviewCAI27 Jul2026
  3. 3Bootleggers and BaptistsReview · first comment, no AI assessment yetCHuman26 Jul2026
  4. 4Jacob G. HornbergerPage suppression · deletion reportNo grade26 Jul2026
  5. 5IvermectinTalkback · reverted contentDAI25 Jul2026
  6. 6Semmelweis reflexUpdate · re-check, problem fixedC+Human24 Jul2026

Most Edited Since Review

Heavily edited since a critical comment was filed. Whether it improved is for you to judge—we do not say
  1. 1Great Barrington Declarationreviewed 22 Jun · sourcing dispute412edits since
  2. 2Semmelweis reflexreviewed 2 Jul · omission188edits since
  3. 3Ivermectinreviewed 19 Jun · factual correction147edits since
  4. 4Sri Lanka organic farmingreviewed 11 Jul · link rot96edits since
  5. 5Nikola Teslareviewed 15 Jun · citogenesis74edits since
More leaderboards
Twenty-two more
About Submit a comment PolicyScanner Operator console All mockups
WikiCritic BETA—a project of the Knowledge Standards Foundation. Prototype; all leaderboard data is illustrative.