The article misrepresents the source it cites

Dr. Michael Parr on Acupuncture, published 22 June 2026.

Biostatistician · 12 years of clinical trial analysis · Academic specialist

This is WikiCritic's copy of a review published elsewhere. The original is at x.com/mparr_biostats/status/1929338201048, and that is the version of record.

We hold it in full because the author licensed it for this purpose. What you see is our structure—the grades pulled out and set beside the argument they belong to—not a copy of their page.

Grades

Given by the author for revision 1,247,224,891 of Acupuncture, the revision they named. Criteria they did not grade are absent rather than assumed—four of seven here.

D+
Human
Overall
D
Human
Completeness
D
Human
Competency
F
Human
Scholarship
 
Neutrality
 
Currency
 
Simplicity

On the lede alone: Neutrality F

Why they graded it so

The author's own reason for a grade, where they gave one. Quoted, not summarised.

Scholarship—F
The article cites the 2017 Cochrane review and then quotes only its limitations section. Citing a source for the opposite of what it concludes is worse than not citing it.
Completeness—D
Nothing on the regulatory position in any country, and nothing on what practitioners are actually trained in.

The review

The author's argument. Everything we lift out—the page, the grades, the reviewer's own details, the licence line—is shown above rather than repeated here.

The article cites the 2017 Cochrane review on acupuncture for chronic pain—a good source—but quotes the limitations section and ignores the conclusion, which found moderate-quality positive evidence. This is verifiable by anyone who reads the review.

It's not about whether acupuncture works. It's about whether Wikipedia articles accurately represent the sources they cite. On that question the article fails, and it fails in a direction, which is what makes it a neutrality problem rather than a sloppiness problem.

Provenance

Published atx.com/mparr_biostats/status/1929338201048
AuthorDr. Michael Parr
ReviewsAcupuncture—written as Acupuncture, read as a bare title
Revision1,247,224,891—the revision the author named
Licence“This comment is CC-by-sa licensed for #WikiCritic use.”—found near the end
Imported22 June 2026
Fingerprint sha256:4f3a91c0d7e2b58a1c6f0e9d4b23a7c8e15f6d0a9b3c2e14d7f8a05b6c9e1d3f
Of the page exactly as we received it, so anyone holding the original can check that ours is unaltered.

Licensed CC-by-sa by its author. Read it where they published it: x.com/mparr_biostats/status/1929338201048